Healthcare Professionals

A Foundation of Clinical Evidence

The Corvia Atrial Shunt is the most clinically studied atrial shunt for the reduction of Left Atrial Pressure (LAP) in heart failure patients with EF≥40%.

Nearly 1,000 patients have been studied to date through multiple studies around the world. Clinical results have consistently established the safety of the Corvia Atrial Shunt System and have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in heart failure patients with an EF≥40% and elevated left atrial pressure.1-2

>600

Corvia Atrial Shunts
implanted globally

>2000

Implanted patient-years of follow-up3

9+

Years post-implant for the longest ongoing Corvia Atrial Shunt patients3

30+

Peer-reviewed publications
on the Corvia Atrial Shunt performance & mechanism of action

2-Year Responder Group Highlights
From REDUCE LAP-HF II1

Reduction in HF event rate compared to sham control at two years.

Greater improvement in KCCQ-OSS compared to sham control at two years.

PROCEDURAL SUCCESS

Successful shunt implantation when transseptal puncture is performed for shunt placement3

PATENCY

Flow detected with no echocardiographic evidence of thrombus through two years of follow-up

Events in Responders Through 2 YearsCorvia Atrial Shunt
(N=161)
Sham Control
(N=152)
p-value
Cardiovascular mortality1.9%1.4%0.72
Non-fatal ischemic stroke1.9%0.0%
New or worsening kidney dysfunction8.8%14.9%0.10
Major adverse cardiac events3.8%2.7%0.61
≥30% Decrease in TAPSE3.1%2.7%0.83

HEAR FROM THE EXPERTS

Global experts Prof. Maja Cikes and Prof. Finn Gustafsson share insights and their perspectives on the 2-year results from the REDUCE LAP-HF II trial.

New 2-year echocardiographic data from REDUCE LAP-HF II provides evidence of the favorable long-term effect of atrial shunting on heart structure and function, and support the definition of Corvia Atrial Shunt “Responders”. The analysis showed that the Corvia Atrial Shunt led to reverse remodeling of the left heart chambers and increases in volume of the right heart chambers, without compromising right ventricle systolic function compared to sham.

CONCLUSIONECHOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE

Shunt is unloading
left heart
Decreased LA/LV volume vs sham
Decreased LA pressure vs sham
Decreased mitral regurgitation grade vs sham

Shunt is not negatively
affecting right heart
No difference in PASP vs sham
No difference in RA systolic pressure vs sham
No difference in RV systolic function vs sham

Blood flow through
shunt from LA to RA
Increased RA volume vs sham
Increased RV end-diastolic volume vs sham
(LA=left atrium, RA=right atrium, LV=left ventricle, RV=right ventricle, PASP=pulmonary arterial systolic pressure)
  1. Gustafsson, F, Petrie, M, Komtebedde, J. et al. 2-Year Outcomes of an Atrial Shunt Device in HFpEF/HFmrEF: Results From REDUCE LAP-HF II. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 1 Jun 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2024.04.011
  2. Patel, R., et al. “Atrial Shunt Device Effects on Cardiac Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The REDUCE LAP-HF II Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Card. (2024)
  3. Unpublished data of June 1, 2024 compiled from Corvia Clinical Trials and on file at Corvia Medical.
  4. Statistical analyses conducted by Baim Institute for Clinical Research. Data on file.
  5. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) at 1- and 2-years = 0.49 [95% CI: 0.25-0.95], p=0.034